Thursday, August 27, 2009
5 Weeks later
I teach the year 10's Geography and History. For Geography, I have asked the students to use a blog to write a reflection on some new learning or to answer a higher order question based on a lesson. Students have enjoyed the opportunity to develop their writing skills and to also constructively critique each other's blog entries by leaving comments on each other's blog. You can keep track of each student's work by being a follower, or you can use the RSS feed into Google Reader. It's a quick way of ensuring that students are doing their homework and make reference to individual student's work in class discussion.
Initially, it was tedious to get all students to the same point as believe it or not, many students had no idea how to set up a blog. This immediately made me feel better because we tend to assume that all kids know more about technology than us - not true.
The fun part has been preparing the Wiki for the same group of students but this time for History. I have been able to have students post their group work findings on this wiki for the study of different Australian governments. I have also posted a lot of my own resources, Youtube clips, Scootle learning pathways and other website links. The students also record their opinions and questions which guides our discussion in class. It is amazingly easy to do with only a limited knowledge of Wikis. So far, I haven't come across any student who knows more than me which makes me think that they don't know as much as I thought they did about technology.
The benefits: Students are now working, communicating outside of class hours and apparently....dare I say...enjoying it!! This has made it less of a rush to get through content, and I still make time for traditional lessons where we construct a class notes to document the learning as I would normally do.
Monday, July 20, 2009
Module 10

Secondly, as I consolidate my own learning, I would like to start to share my learnings from this course with my faculty staff. Some are more proficient than others, but there is a culture of "having a go" which I would like to capitalise on. It helps by having students who are usually generous with their appreciation when staff try to be inventive for benefit of more effective learning.
Sunday, July 19, 2009
Module 9
Second Life is less attractive to me, because it was initially established for entertainment purposes prior to finding an educational use. I think that that for subjects like History and Geography, and maybe even Business, immersing students is an excellent way for them to learn. The problem is that after a little while, the students will want to use Second Life more for what is was designed for - entertainment! I attended a lecture with Dr.Torsten Reiners from Hamburg University who explained how virtual worlds work and how they can be used in teaching and learning. While it was interesting, the opportunity for users to disengage from their real life in favour of their Second World life could cause social problems ranging from addiction to bullying. This was probably not what Kevin Rudd had in mind when he announced his Education Revolution in 2007.
This brings me to an issue that has been getting some airtime lately. Do learning standards improve with allowing students access to Web 2.0 tools like Second Life?? I have my doubts, because there is an overriding assumption that students will be naturally drawn to to the educational elements more than the entertainment elements. Kids haven't changed that much! The distracting elements for students have just grown exponentially and some major thought needs to be put into this. The major newspapers carried a story on the effectiveness of public dollars being spent on putting laptops in front of school students on 20 July, 2009. See the link below:
This article claims that the key component of Kevin Rudd's educational revolution, the laptop rollout to students, may be not derive the benefits that were first thought likely. Studies in the US show that literacy and numeracy standards have actually gone backwards. This seems to clash with the Federal Government's focus on Naplan and the intention of using this to provide information for school league tables. Skeptics might say that this reflects a poorly thought out national educational agenda, and one that is currently being driven by the political scrutineers that advise the PM on the best way to secure votes. Some educationalists are maybe swayed by the large amounts of money available. Have a look at the Four Corners report that announced the laptop rollout program 18 months ago. Some of the issues raised then have still not been addressed.
Saturday, July 18, 2009
Module 8

Module 7

The social networking aspect is a great way of sharing resources in an efficient and organised manner that will add efficiency and consistency when teachers in a faculty are planning their lessons. It also opens the door for more collaboration between teachers from other schools. In the past, when meeting up with colleagues at inservices, the best of intentions about passing on a good website has evaporated once the busyness of school resumes. Networking Delicious users overcomes this problem.
Friday, July 17, 2009
Module 6

Thursday, July 16, 2009
Module 5
Do I think vodcasts, podcasts and Youtube could enhance student learning in and out of the classroom? Absolutely. Does it also present challenges in the effective use of classroom time and allow students to filter information from entertainment and create evidence of real learning in a short period of time? Absolutely.
If I asked students to find a video from youtube that reflects how animals adapt to their environment, I am pretty sure that they would use their school-issued macs to laugh about while they watched the following youtube video of a cat flushing a toilet.
This is not meant to to be a slur on the commitment of students to their homework tasks; just a fact of life that as technology moves forward, the way it is utilised by society can give the appearance of going backwards and we are inadvertently dumbing ourselves down.
EdPod (http://www.abc.net.au/rn/edpod/) has a collection of podcasts from ABC radio. An interview on Thursday 25th June 2009 between host, Richard Eady and guest Marco Torres caught my attention. Marco is an educational advisor to President Obama. He talks candidly of the need to make students creators of information rather than recipients of information, as was the traditional model of educating young people. He acknowledges that there is too much hype around the tools of technology rather than focusing on the outcomes of relevant learning. Podcasting can be achieved by anyone who has the technical experience, but like good journalism, the quality of the product is defined more by the level of research prior to creation rather than by mere fact that it was published. I think the cat video supports my view.
Having said that, poor research methods, plagiarism, and under-developed thinking skills are time honoured problems experienced by students of all generations. Podcasting could actually help students tackle these problems should they be given enough time and direction to synthesise course content. At the very least, it can create a hook for student engagement. The problem is that curriculum content, particularly secondary schools and increasingly also in primary schools, is getting broader rather than deeper and this can undermine the opportunities for students and teachers to effectively use podcasts because of time constraints. In the meantime, I see real potential for my students in accessing podcasts and vodcasts and then using this as a model for maybe creating their own vodcast so long as it doesn't involve cats and toilets.
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Module 4
For the rest of us there seems to be efficiency in using Flickr to communicate. If a picture tells a thousand words, and Flickr can store hundreds of pictures, then this may just facilitate better communication between tech-heads, which is what they really need.
In the classroom, most students are visual learners and think this means they only use mind maps. They are more likely to become engaged by critiquing a photograph in the way that Jamie McKenzie suggests in order to elicit higher order thinking. The question remains as to whether a personalised digital footprint left by users could ever be used unethically? The students, I suppose, will answer this one for us in due course.
This is Berrick. He travels extensively overseas and likes to let his friend Harold know about the places he has visited. Berrick uses Flickr to store all his photographs, and has given Harold permission to look at them. Harold uses the best of these photographs in his job as a travel writer which is good because Harold has polio and can’t travel. It just goes to show that Flickr can be used for more than just entertainment. It can nurture imagination and opportunities. Just what our students need!!
Module 3
In an education context, Google Docs has potential for students to access their own work from any computer, and make it easier for collaboration with other students to occur as a working document is enhanced from different user points. There must be cost benefits in saving server space in schools as documents are not duplicated by being saved in a plethora of folders and drives, with most being completely forgotten or lost.
From my own point of view, it would be handy to view the work of students as they construct an assessment task, rather than wait for a nasty surprise when they hand in a rushed first draft. Will it lead to better quality of student work? Maybe, but the premise for this is always hard work and organisation, rather than efficient applications on their computer. As they say, Google Docs can bring the horse to the well, but it is up the horse (if it studies Geography) to work out why there is no water in it and then consider the climatic conditions that have threatened ecological sustainability of all horses. Horses studying Maths would simply work out the circumference of the well, while PDHPE horses would use the beep test as it runs around the well to see whether it has sufficient fitness to withstand dehydration or even death. My point is, that Google Docs, on its own, will not make students think.
Thursday, July 2, 2009
Module 2
I'm not too sure about the privacy issues of blogs, and whether it could be mis-used by members or external viewers. Sharing blogs could be a great way of students from other schools to collaborate and open their eyes to academic standards outside their own school, so I think the benefits far outweigh the risks.
Looking forward to learning more.